CFO
Menu
  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Growth Companies
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Strategy
  • Technology
  • Sign InSign Up
CFO
  • Conferences
  • Webcasts
  • Research
  • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Training
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
CFO
The Ongoing Evolution of FP&A
Global Survey Identifies 7 Key Insights
Square Root Costing: A Better Method
Square root costing is the only costing…
Does Diversity Pay Off?
CFOs Look to Quantify Inclusion Initiatives
  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Growth Companies
  • Strategy
  • Technology
Financial Reporting

Do Companies Adjust Revenue in Response to Investor Behavior?

Research suggests a correlation between market sensitivity to financial results and reported revenue in the following quarter.

David McCann
May 17, 2017 | CFO.com | US
share
Tweet
Print

Email this article

A new study offers fresh evidence that companies may manipulate their financial results in response to investor behavior.

The American Accounting Association research, which studied 6,836 public companies over a period of more than 16 years, measured the market’s sensitivity to quarterly revenue and earnings results.

Recommended Stories:
  • WageWorks to Restate Results, CFO Resigns
  • Metric of the Month: Cycle Time for Monthly Close
  • MetLife Shares Plunge on Restatement News

For each company in each quarter, the study calculated two metrics to reflect such sensitivity: revenue response coefficient (RRC) and earnings response coefficient (ERC). RRC represents the degree to which stocks rise and fall in response to the disparity between analysts’ revenue forecasts and actual performance, and ERC represents the same with regard to earnings.

The study showed that in quarters immediately following those when RRC was above the median for all studied companies, 16% of firms reported revenue that barely met or slightly exceeded analysts’ forecasts. In contrast, only 9% of firms did the same following quarters of below-median RRC.

The pattern was strikingly reversed when it came to ERC. Following quarters of low ERC, 15% of the companies reported revenue that barely met or slightly exceeded analysts’ revenue forecasts. Only 11.5% did so following quarters of high ERC.

In other words, it appears that when investors react to revenue announcements, revenue in the following quarter is more likely to align with analysts’ revenue forecasts than is the case when investors react to earnings announcements.

“Clearly, corporate managers are attuned to what investors are looking for in their companies’ reports and to the weight investors assign to revenues as distinct from earnings,” says Rong Zhao, an assistant accounting professor at the University of Calgary, who performed the research. “And to a considerable degree, the revenues they report reflect this.”

She adds, “Given the fact that company financial results conform as conveniently as they do to what investors are looking for, one also has to wonder about the extent of accounting manipulation in bringing this about. … The unusually high frequency of small positive revenue surprises … suggests that firms attempt to cross the thresholds of revenue forecasted by analysts.”

The correlation was evident in all sectors studied: health care, technology, consumer, manufacturing, and a fifth category labeled as “miscellaneous other” sectors. But in the health care and technology sectors, the stock market’s sensitivity to reported revenues was almost double that of the other sectors.

Thus, notes Zhao, if a high-tech or drug company just meets or slightly beats analysts’ revenue benchmarks, there may be less to that achievement than meets the eye, as such companies have a heightened incentive to manage their accounting with precisely that goal in mind.

A similar motivation is also at work, the findings suggest, for companies at relatively early stages of development. Defining firms’ life cycles on the basis of three factors — dividend payout, sales growth, and age — Zhao found that the positive association with RRC and meeting revenue benchmarks is stronger for less-developed firms.

Commenting on the balance between earnings and revenue in terms of investor priority, she comments that “for what it’s worth, I think the general emphasis of the market now is back to growing revenue after several years of focusing on cost reduction during the financial crisis.”

The study, “Revenue Benchmark-Beating and the Sector-Level Investor Pricing of Revenue and Earnings,” is in the June issue of Accounting Horizons, published quarterly by the American Accounting Association.

Post navigation

← Industrial Output Rises for 3rd Straight Month
‘Wannacry’ Spotlights Need for Cyber Liability Coverage →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

Popular Articles

  1. 10 Habits of Highly Effective CFOs
  2. No Mystery How to Restrain Health Costs
  3. Zero-based Budgeting Is Surging
  4. Pay Ratio Disclosures Mislead Investors
  5. No More Tax Deductions for Bad Actions
Advertisement
 

Topics

  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Growth Companies
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Strategy
  • Technology

Media

  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • Research
  • Magazine

Events

  • Conferences
  • Argyle Events
  • Webcasts

Services

  • Reprints
  • Back Issues
  • Mobile
  • Widgets
  • RSS

About CFO

  • About CFO
  • Editorial Staff
  • Press
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Want the Magazine?

Relax and unplug with our award-winning coverage.

Subscribe Now
Follow Us