Five years ago, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan deciphered the global market meltdown and credit freeze in a speech at Georgetown University. “In a market system based on trust, reputation has a significant economic value,” he said. Today, those words and the economic decline in 2008 explain why reputation is becoming one of the hottest issues in management.
Reputation and its value are now a central focus for governance, controls and enterprise risk management. In 2013, reputation was disclosed as a material risk in more than 66 percent of S&P 500 companies’ 10-Ks, up from 8 percent in 2009. Reputation is deemed the No. 1 board-level risk by more than 70 percent of directors surveyed for two years running by the accounting firm EisnerAmper.
Yet there is no objective or reliable framework for reputational value management. The reason is that most models of reputation rely on the opinion polls and sentiment surveys normally used to measure brands. These measure fluid and unrealized thoughts — responses that are often forgotten soon after. They don’t measure the financially relevant behaviors that reflect stakeholder expectations of governance, sustainability and other attributes of reputation.
Consensiv LLC, a provider of reputation controls, has a new framework and tools for managing that reputational value and risk. Powered by reputational “big data” value metrics from reputation insurer Steel City Re, Consensiv’s monthly league table tracks the relative value of stakeholder expectations and their consistency over time. Notably, the calculations do not involve likability or other qualitative attributes associated with marketing and brand research. (See “Methodology” on the next page.)
This month’s ranking illustrates how quantitative outcomes of stakeholder expectations can be used to understand and control reputational value. (For the full Consensiv 50 Chart, click here.) One of the most notable qualities of reputation is reliability, as evidenced by priceline.com. Priceline.com is one of only two consumer-services companies that has consistently stayed on the list for the first half of 2013. Most consumer-services businesses’ reputations are somewhat volatile because they serve a consumer base that’s highly sensitive to external influences, such as competitor promotions. The sector also relies on a dynamic workforce that is regularly exposed to risks of safety, security and supply-chain integrity. (McDonald’s, the other league table stalwart in this sector, doesn’t appear until 24th place.)
Priceline.com bucks this trend with an established global network of hardware and software tools that effectively match travel services supply with consumer demand, which earns it steady and profitable cash flows. Priceline.com signals in its regulatory filings its need to control risks to its reputational value, which is mentioned 12 times in its 2013 Form 10-K Item 1A.