Last fall the Securities and Exchange Commission promised to scrutinize the regulatory filings of the largest financial institutions. So it’s little wonder that many of the recent comment letters sent by the SEC to corporations focused on the more controversial accounting issues that cropped up during the current financial crisis, including valuations of financial instruments and other-than-temporary impairments of securities.
The regulator has also niggled nonfinancial firms, by asking finance executives to better explain how they worked through goodwill impairment testing. Brad Davidson, a partner at accounting firm Crowe Horwath who recently compiled a list of frequent topics cited by SEC staffers in comment letters, says finance executives should keep the points raised by SEC staffers in mind as they put the finishing touches on their next round of financial reporting.
The Crowe Horwath file covers letters sent during the third quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. According to the accounting firm, some recent letters have asked SEC registrants to better explain why securities with fair values significantly below cost are not considered other-than-temporary impairments, discuss how the company confirmed third-party valuations, provide breakdowns of credit risk in loan portfolios, and justify the movement between the observable and unobservable inputs used to calculate fair values.
SEC comment letters are a “routine” part of the financial-reporting process, says Davidson, and usually do not lead to restatements. The letters are addressed to either the company’s CEO or CFO, and are crafted to extract more data from management beyond the figures in financial statements. Generally, companies collect input from their outside auditors and general counsel before they respond, notes Davidson.
“The SEC is trying, in these letters, to understand what the companies are doing in terms of disclosures, and then trying to help them improve disclosures going forward,” he adds.
One pervasive issue among the SEC letters is that of goodwill impairment, which affects companies of all types that reported faltering business units. Indeed, as CFO.com previously reported, more than 400 public companies recorded goodwill impairment charges in the past 12 months, according to data retrieved from CapitalIQ.
While goodwill write-downs have no effect on a company’s cash holdings, they imply that the business overpaid for a previous acquisition, which resulted in a hit to earnings. Under generally accepted accounting principles, goodwill — the intangible asset representing the excess amount above book value that one company pays for another in an acquisition — must be tested at least yearly or more frequently when a “triggering event” occurs. The testing process requires companies to account for the reduced value of an asset when its market value is lower than the amount assigned to it on the balance sheet.
For many companies last year, the credit crisis could have been interpreted as a triggering event, as rapidly falling stock prices dragged down the values of deals made during the M&A heyday. Earlier this year, for instance, Sprint Nextel wrote down the last $1 billion of its goodwill impairment for its 2005 purchase of Nextel, reflecting a $1.6 billion total loss for one quarter.