With the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) set to expire at the end of 2014, corporate risk managers are worrying aloud about what would happen if there’s no property, casualty or workers’ compensation coverage available in connection with a terrorist act.
The anxieties include the possible unraveling of funding for future construction projects, as financiers get cold feet contemplating the total loss that could transpire in the event of an attack. For existing multi-year projects, the risk managers fear that loan covenants could break apart if their companies can’t provide proof of coverage.
Such occurrences are more likely in the real estate industry and in densely populated urban areas. In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, however, the sports and entertainment industries are now seen to be at risk. The transportation and petrochemical industries have long been considered vulnerable to attack.
Geographically speaking, the inability to procure workers’ compensation coverage relating to terrorist acts can affect companies in any region.
As they did in the run-ups to the first extension of TRIA in 2005 and a later one in 2007, risk managers are growing jittery about what might happen if federal backing for terrorism insurance abruptly dries up. Considering current skepticism about government bailouts of companies deemed too big to fail, that’s a distinct possibility, some think.
Indeed, the fear that federal support will sunset starting in 2015 is already roiling commercial insurance policies. “Without the certainty of an extension of [federal backing], we are beginning to see provisos written into new insurance contracts that limit or eliminate terrorism coverage after December 31, 2014,” Alexandra Littlejohn, an insurance-placement officer with Willis, the large insurance brokerage, testified at a New York City Council hearing on Monday. The council was mulling whether to submit a proposal to extend TRIA to the U.S. Congress.
Under the act, which became law in 2002, federal benefits paid to insurers suffering losses from a certified terrorist attack start being calculated once the industry’s aggregate insured losses from the attack exceed $100 million.
Once that threshold is exceeded, an insurer that suffers losses must pay claims up to a deductible of 20 percent of its previous year’s premiums. After reaching that deductible, insurers must absorb 15 percent of any added losses up to the program cap of $100 billion. (The law doesn’t address how losses above the $100 billion cap would be handled.)
If in fact the law does expire, “insurance companies will again review their portfolios and will refuse to offer affordable terrorism coverage in high risk areas,” said Lori Seidenberg, senior vice president of enterprise risk management, Centerline Capital Group, testifying on behalf of the Risk and Insurance Management Society.