Problem audits with the IRS are always a little bit of everybody’s fault. Taxpayers who feel bullied become unresponsive. Auditors who feel ignored take a hard line. Before you know it, no one is talking, every exchange is hostile and the point of the tax audit is entirely forgotten.
“What’s the point of a tax audit?” is a question I get asked a lot, and it seems that the answer surprises many people. Believe it or not, the IRS audits your company to get to the right answer. Unfortunately, the complexity of the tax code, regulations and administrative rules means getting “the right answer” has to be a collaborative effort.
For years, the service has considered a cooperative dialogue to be the gold standard of an IRS audit. In my thirty years with the IRS — starting as a field examiner and ending as the Large Business & International (LB&I) Senior Executive for Financial Services — it was always my policy to talk to the taxpayers and their representatives as the jumping off point for every part of the audit. Over the last few years, the service has started putting in place policies to make cooperative dialogue not just the gold standard, but the standard.
On June 18, 2013, the LB&I division announced a new policy for audits that they hope will get auditors and taxpayers talking. The policy, issued in Directive LB&I-04-0613-004, outlines a new approach to Information Document Requests – usually just called IDRs. Agents issue IDRs to gather information about items under review. Typical IDRs ask for documents, interviews and other information. Unfortunately, many times IDRs wind up being overly broad, casting as wide a net as possible instead of narrowing the audit’s scope to get to the right answer. The June 18 directive changes the emphasis of the IDR process in the hopes of encouraging greater cooperation and greater transparency in exams.
Under the new guidelines, IDRs have three new universal requirements: 1) they must be “issue focused;” 2) they must be discussed with the taxpayer beforehand; and 3) appropriate deadlines must be discussed and set. On November 4, 2013, the service issued Directive LB&I-04-1113-009, clarifying how it would implement these new requirements. The November 4 directive sets out 13 steps LB&I agents are supposed to take when issuing any IDRs:
- Discuss the issue related to the IDR with the taxpayer.
- Discuss how the information requested is related to the issue under consideration and why it is necessary.
- After this consultation with the taxpayer, determine what information will ultimately be requested in the IDR.
- Ensure the IDR clearly states the issue that is being considered and that the IDR only requests information relevant to the stated issue.
- Prepare one IDR for each issue.
- Use numbers or letters on the IDR for clarity.
- Ensure that the IDR is written using clear and concise language.
- Confirm that the IDR is customized to the taxpayer or industry.
- Provide a draft of the IDR and discuss its contents with the taxpayer.
- After this discussion is complete, determine with the taxpayer a reasonable timeframe for a response to the IDR.
- If agreement on a response date cannot be reached, the examiner or specialist will set a reasonable response date for the IDR.
- When determining the response date, ensure that the examiner or specialist commits to a date by which the IDR will be reviewed and a response provided to the taxpayer on whether the information received satisfies the IDR. This date should be noted on the IDR.
- If the information requested in the IDR is not received by the response date, the examiner or specialist will follow the IDR Enforcement Process set forth in Attachment 2.